Friday, August 27, 2010

Intelligent agents, aren't we?

We are living in an era in which we have intelligent agents to handle many things we do or wanna do. There will be a lot more things possible in the near future from talking to your doctor to umpiring a cricket match. By definition an intelligent agent, in its simplest definition, is software that is given and executes a particular task and reports back to the user. They have been employed to execute tasks on behalf of a business process, computer application or an individual(1). If you thought this is gonna be a passage about those softwares, programs or robots you are wrong. It's about us.
Looking in the mirror.
At one stage or another we all might have asked ourselves the question "what are we?" . Well, some of us define our existence in philosophical terms, some others rely on spirituality, some patient ones are ready to seek it rationally and some others just give it up. The laws of nature seem to be too complicated and randomness seems to be a universal attribute of all objects. Even though physicists have been trying to find out the laws behind the universe they find it difficult to come up with a "theory of everything". Now, you must be thinking, "wait a minute, what bullshit are you gonna talk about?". This is not a theory, these are just some random thoughts popped up in my head.
Some queries.
Are we just some Intelligent agents walking on a planet which is a mere network created just for some properties like sensing, gathering or producing information? Isn't this universe a web of information just like what we are? We find information everywhere we look. We gather it, analyse it and organize it. We even create new information from what we have got. We communicate to each other. Isn't it what we get or expect to get Intelligent agents to do for us? Every other things we do are just to support our existence. The human minds are connected via telephone cables, wireless networks and satellites. That's where terms like collective mind as found by C.G Jung start making sense. We hear people saying, everything is for a purpose. If that's true, what purpose? People believe in supernatural existences like Gods and demons which they were never able to explain in physical terms. Neurologists say God is just another thought induced in the brain(2). And experiments like Langton's ants show very interesting patterns can arise from very simple rules. If we are following rules, what kinda rules are they? Who compiled those rules?
The Super-programmers
If there exist another bunch of beings who use us, what would they look like? How do they interact with us to control information? The possible answer is , 'Exactly like we interact with intelligent agents.' The intelligent agents we have created interact with each other as well. We have agents to predict weather, talk to us about the weather, etc etc. We can be doing the same. We interact with them without knowing we are interacting with them. We respond to our situations. We get chemical reactions going inside our brains every time a stimuli from what we sense from outside our bodies. And we react correspondingly according to what we have known from previous experiences or as per what is programmed as reflex actions. Agents do the same. They interact with their situations, including our queries and responses from other agents according to what is stored in their knowledge base or as per the codes in their program. A doubt can arise in us now, why are we not able to sense our programmers?(if there is any). Are the softwares aware of the programmer sitting in front of the computer? Softwares interact only with instructions, not with the programmer or user. Similarly, they(even they can be some agents/programs) can be interacting with our brain waves at the programming level and with our universe at an application level.
The Protocols
What kind of rules are governing our minds? Let's just think about what kind of thoughts let us do things or not let do things. Our actions are directed or restricted by some factors called morality, rationality, desire, fear etc. These factors are likely to be the protocols that govern the way we behave. For different type of agents, different set of rules. Plants, animals, micro-organisms , etc all have their set of behavioral patterns.
The Conclusion
This is not a subject that can be concluded in five or six paragraphs, but as I've said earlier just some random signals generated in my brain. I'm not stating a theory here. This is more like a comparative study between what we create and what we are. I'm looking forward for responses from other agents.

2 comments:

  1. "Now, I want you to think about
    the perfect set of circumstances
    that put this celestial
    ball of fire at just...
    the correct distance
    from our little blue planet
    for life to evolve.
    Making it possible for you to be
    sitting here in this riveting lecture.
    That's a nice thought, right?
    Everything has a purpose.
    An order to it.
    Is determined.
    But then, there's the other
    side of the argument.
    The theory of randomness.
    Which says it's all
    simply a coincidence.
    The very fact we exist is nothing
    but the result of a complex,
    yet inevitable string
    of chemical accidents
    and biological mutations.
    There is no grand meaning.
    There's no purpose."

    "What about you,
    professor Koestler?"
    -"What?"
    -"What do you believe?"
    "I think shit just happens."

    This is an excerpt from the movie Knowing. Like professor Koestler says there is an equal possibility for "Theory of Randomness" counter to "Theory of Certainty"(which says everything is a part of pre written program code).What if "everything that we see, that we are is the "result of a complex,yet inevitable string of chemical accidents and biological mutations" ?
    It might be interesting to think about how we actually "get instructed".We are a kind of system which is capable of programming itself. A small baby who burns its finger accidently on fire is actually programming itself an instruction : 'never put ur finger into the fire'. This is how we develop without a master programmar , or God or a demon.
    Well it all winds up to the one last question .
    -"What do you believe?"
    and I would also prefer to believe
    "shit just happens."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I still have doubts on our decision making capabilities. These days i hear the term "consciousness" a lot, which leads me to think again and again before stating "Freewill doesn't exist/ freewill does exist." to myself. Choice is there or like some others prefer to say ,the illusion of choice is there. The problem is how much of it is an illusion.

    I agree it is a self-growing program, but completely self written? I don't believe in an origin, but i can see the existence. Should we spoil the thrill by believing that every phenomenon in nature is mere coincidence?

    ReplyDelete